Essay --

Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer was born in the midst of New York City to a blind drunk family in 1904. He had German decent on his mothers side whose family had lived in the United States for a few generations, band senesce his have, Julius Oppenheimer, had only recently come from Germany. His father was a farmer and a grain merchant in Germany. When he arrived at New York, He started working at Rothfeldt-Stern Company,a textile import employment that was run by two of his uncles. The company changed their business to tailored suits, Julius quickly worked his way up the ranks. When Julius and Ella, Roberts mother, got married in 1903, they lived in an elegant apartment in the Upper West Side of New York City. Julius Oppenheimer was a man of art. He met Ella at a New York Exhibition for European artists. The works of famous artists livened their apartment. Oppenheimer showed signs of brilliance very early on in his life. His interests as a child were minerals, reading, writing poetry, and building with blocks. His interest in minerals was sparked when his grandfather gave him a pack of labeled rocks on the familys trips to Germany. When he became eleven he wrote a paper to the New York Mineralogy Society. When he showed for the lecture, the other members were surprised to find a boy of eleven while the next youngest member was in his seventies. While his parents were delighted by his brilliance, his mother found his antisocial traits to be worrisome and encouraged him to interact with other boys his age but his personality did not allow him to be a social person throughout his early years. In 1912, Oppenheimer gained a brother by the gain of Frank. His brother being eight years younger than Oppenheimer, he was not as gifted as his brot... ...oard and after a long trial had his certification Clearance revoked. Despite the public out roar, he moved on to Princeton, and took over as the Director of Advanced Study from Albert Einstein. After he res igned he went on to live a quiet life on Long Island spending time sailing and horseback riding with his wife and children. He was awarded an Enrico femtometer award in 1963. He died in 1967, of throat cancer, leaving a great impact of the world. Overall, Oppenheimer was one of the world greatest influences and scientists in the world. His studies and research into atomic science helped develop modern power usage of radioactive elements and he also helped end the Second World War. While many scientists expressed their affliction in participation in the Manhattan Project, Oppenheimer did not regret his participation because he saw the good and bad in both sides.

Marks and Spencer Strategy Insight :: Business Management Retail Consumerism Essays

Marks and Spencer Strategy InsightAt the Marks & Spencer AGM, on the 11th July 2001, Luc Vandevelde, the Chairman and Chief administrator of Marks & Spencer, gave a key speech regarding the managements recovery plan for the company, which was launched earlier in the year. The speech and extracts from Marks & Spencer Press Releases, presented below, provide a valuable acumen into the nature of strategic planning within large organisations, and the role of the Chairman and Chief Executive in this process.Extracts from the SpeechGood morning. Welcome to the 2001 Annual General Meeting. I want to pick up exactly where we left off a year ago. In response to the very last question from the floor at the 2000 AGM, I made this recital I am taking charge and I will create shareholder value in the future.Id like you to keep that statement in mind. In everything we have done or are planning to do for your Company, we share with you the common objective of increasing the value of your investme nt by returning Marks & Spencer to its rightful, leading position in the marketplace.As to taking charge, at the last AGM Id been with Marks & Spencer for less than five months - and I didnt take over as Chief Executive until two months after the AGM in September 2000.At that point, a little over six months in, I came to certain conclusions about the Companys dodging ... and it took six months because Marks & Spencer is a very unique and very complex company.My conclusion was that the recovery plan, then in place, was doing a lot of useful things ... ready us closer to our customers, improving our supply chain, and so on. But it still wasnt good enough to address the real problems of the Company which, as Ive already admitted, were to a greater extent serious than I realised when I first took up this post.The previous plan was like feeding a tree that was already overgrown and unhealthy. What it genuinely needed was serious pruning back. It had unproductive limbs that were hampe ring its growth and a lot of its best characteristics were lost in the foliage.It became clear that for M&S to grow productively, we had to get back to its core strengths - to those fundamentals that underpinned its success in the past - and begin our recovery from there.Putting together the right team

A Shot that Ricocheted through History Essay -- essays research papers

A Shot That Ricocheted Through taradiddleMedgar Evers was a valet who was not afraid to stand up for what he believed in. He believed that one-day blacks and whites would be able to associate with each other without racial interference. He would later die for what he believed and leave an example for alone who was following in his path. The man believed to have shot him was tried three times and finally convicted in the third political campaign nearly thirty years after his death. Evers was seen as a martyr for all black to look up to.As complaisant rights began to gain economic aid of the United States, blacks decided they needed to change their prelude from court cases to a to a greater extent nonviolent approach. On August 28, 1963, the movement reached its strongest points. They made a work on at Washington D. C., and wanted to federal civil rights legislation to give them equal rights. This is where Martin Luther force gave his famous I Have A Dream speech. King belie ved that most whites were basically decent and when faced by love would allow injustice and brutality to continue. (Jordan) The nonviolent approach would prove to be a mend approach for them in later times.When blacks began charging their approach, they began preferring sit-ins. This all started at a public lunch counter at F. W. Woolsworths in Greensboro, North Carolina and began to spread to all public land counties across the south. As sit-ins became more common, they moved to other public places such as parks, movie theatres, swimming pools, libraries, lobbies, and many other discriminate facilities. After several months of sit-ins, they began to become desegregated. Blacks in any case began a strong movement to get public schools desegregated as well. They finally succeeded with Ole Miss, when they accepted James Meredith into the school. President Kennedy also tried to help blacks by approaching the occupation with caution. He did this by encouraging company with government contracts to hire black Americans.On July 2, 1925 in Decatur, Ms, a black man by the name of Medgar Wiley Evers was born. Until he joined the Army in 1943, he attended school in Decatur. He served Normandy and to Alcorn to pursue his college didactics in which he majored in business administration. epoch in that respect, he participated in many school... ...egacy of Evers is everywhere present today. This peaceful man, who had constantly urged that violence is not the track ,but paid for his beliefs with his life, was a prominent voice of clamber for civil rights in Mississippi. Many people, including his wife paid tribute to him into years past. His wife wrote a withstand called For Us, The Living, but the best is state to be, Mississippi, Black History Makers. Ten years after his death it was recorded that in that respect had been one hundred and forty atomic number 23 black officials elected to office in Mississippi, and that there was a black student in each of the sta tes private schools. In 1970, the Department of Health, Education, and welfare said that twenty-six percent of black people in the Mississippi public schools system with at least fifty percent white enrollment. In 1913, there were only twenty eight thousand blacks registered voters, and by 1971 there were two hundred and fifty thousand. Even in 1982, there were five hundred thousand. (JDP) though the hard work and struggle of one man was ended with death, the changed be brought about are still evident today. This has only made Mississippi a better and more peaceful place to run short for all races. A Shot that Ricocheted through History Essay -- essays research papers A Shot That Ricocheted Through HistoryMedgar Evers was a man who was not afraid to stand up for what he believed in. He believed that one-day blacks and whites would be able to associate with each other without racial interference. He would later die for what he believed and leave an example for all who was following in his path. The man believed to have shot him was tried three times and finally convicted in the third trial nearly thirty years after his death. Evers was seen as a martyr for all black to look up to.As civil rights began to gain attention of the United States, blacks decided they needed to change their approach from court cases to a more nonviolent approach. On August 28, 1963, the movement reached its strongest points. They made a march at Washington D. C., and wanted to federal civil rights legislation to give them equal rights. This is where Martin Luther King gave his famous I Have A Dream speech. King believed that most whites were basically decent and when faced by love would allow injustice and brutality to continue. (Jordan) The nonviolent approach would prove to be a better approach for them in later times.When blacks began charging their approach, they began preferring sit-ins. This all started at a public lunch counter at F. W. Woolsworths in Greensbo ro, North Carolina and began to spread to all public land counties across the south. As sit-ins became more common, they moved to other public places such as parks, movie theatres, swimming pools, libraries, lobbies, and many other segregated facilities. After several months of sit-ins, they began to become desegregated. Blacks also began a strong movement to get public schools desegregated as well. They finally succeeded with Ole Miss, when they accepted James Meredith into the school. President Kennedy also tried to help blacks by approaching the problem with caution. He did this by encouraging company with government contracts to hire black Americans.On July 2, 1925 in Decatur, Ms, a black man by the name of Medgar Wiley Evers was born. Until he joined the Army in 1943, he attended school in Decatur. He served Normandy and to Alcorn to pursue his college education in which he majored in business administration. While there, he participated in many school... ...egacy of Evers is everywhere present today. This peaceful man, who had constantly urged that violence is not the way ,but paid for his beliefs with his life, was a prominent voice of struggle for civil rights in Mississippi. Many people, including his wife paid tribute to him into years past. His wife wrote a book called For Us, The Living, but the best is said to be, Mississippi, Black History Makers. Ten years after his death it was recorded that there had been one hundred and forty five black officials elected to office in Mississippi, and that there was a black student in each of the states private schools. In 1970, the Department of Health, Education, and welfare said that twenty-six percent of black people in the Mississippi public schools system with at least fifty percent white enrollment. In 1913, there were only twenty eight thousand blacks registered voters, and by 1971 there were two hundred and fifty thousand. Even in 1982, there were five hundred thousand. (JDP) Though the hard work and struggle of one man was ended with death, the changed be brought about are still evident today. This has only made Mississippi a better and more peaceful place to live for all races.

A Shot that Ricocheted through History Essay -- essays research papers

A Shot That Ricocheted Through scoreMedgar Evers was a globe who was non afraid to stand up for what he believed in. He believed that one-day blacks and whites would be able to associate with each other without racial interference. He would later die for what he believed and leave an example for altogether who was following in his path. The man believed to have shot him was tried three times and finally convicted in the third running nearly thirty years after his death. Evers was seen as a martyr for all black to look up to.As accomplished rights began to gain forethought of the United States, blacks decided they needed to change their come up from court cases to a to a greater extent nonviolent approach. On August 28, 1963, the movement reached its strongest points. They made a marching at Washington D. C., and wanted to federal civil rights legislation to give them equal rights. This is where Martin Luther male monarch gave his famous I Have A Dream speech. King believe d that most whites were basically decent and when faced by love would allow injustice and brutality to continue. (Jordan) The nonviolent approach would prove to be a fail approach for them in later times.When blacks began charging their approach, they began preferring sit-ins. This all started at a public lunch counter at F. W. Woolsworths in Greensboro, North Carolina and began to spread to all public land counties across the south. As sit-ins became more common, they moved to other public places such as parks, movie theatres, swimming pools, libraries, lobbies, and many other segregated facilities. After several months of sit-ins, they began to become desegregated. Blacks besides began a strong movement to get public schools desegregated as well. They finally succeeded with Ole Miss, when they accepted James Meredith into the school. President Kennedy also tried to help blacks by approaching the line of work with caution. He did this by encouraging company with government cont racts to hire black Americans.On July 2, 1925 in Decatur, Ms, a black man by the name of Medgar Wiley Evers was born. Until he joined the Army in 1943, he attended school in Decatur. He served Normandy and to Alcorn to pursue his college statement in which he majored in business administration. maculation thither, he participated in many school... ...egacy of Evers is everywhere present today. This peaceful man, who had constantly urged that violence is not the route ,but paid for his beliefs with his life, was a prominent voice of cope for civil rights in Mississippi. Many people, including his wife paid tribute to him into years past. His wife wrote a mass called For Us, The Living, but the best is verbalize to be, Mississippi, Black History Makers. Ten years after his death it was recorded that on that point had been one hundred and forty quint black officials elected to office in Mississippi, and that there was a black student in each of the states private schools. In 1 970, the Department of Health, Education, and welfare said that twenty-six percent of black people in the Mississippi public schools system with at least fifty percent white enrollment. In 1913, there were only twenty eight thousand blacks registered voters, and by 1971 there were two hundred and fifty thousand. Even in 1982, there were five hundred thousand. (JDP) though the hard work and struggle of one man was ended with death, the changed be brought about are still evident today. This has only made Mississippi a better and more peaceful place to pass for all races. A Shot that Ricocheted through History Essay -- essays research papers A Shot That Ricocheted Through HistoryMedgar Evers was a man who was not afraid to stand up for what he believed in. He believed that one-day blacks and whites would be able to associate with each other without racial interference. He would later die for what he believed and leave an example for all who was following in his path. The man believed to have shot him was tried three times and finally convicted in the third trial nearly thirty years after his death. Evers was seen as a martyr for all black to look up to.As civil rights began to gain attention of the United States, blacks decided they needed to change their approach from court cases to a more nonviolent approach. On August 28, 1963, the movement reached its strongest points. They made a march at Washington D. C., and wanted to federal civil rights legislation to give them equal rights. This is where Martin Luther King gave his famous I Have A Dream speech. King believed that most whites were basically decent and when faced by love would allow injustice and brutality to continue. (Jordan) The nonviolent approach would prove to be a better approach for them in later times.When blacks began charging their approach, they began preferring sit-ins. This all started at a public lunch counter at F. W. Woolsworths in Greensboro, North Carolina and began t o spread to all public land counties across the south. As sit-ins became more common, they moved to other public places such as parks, movie theatres, swimming pools, libraries, lobbies, and many other segregated facilities. After several months of sit-ins, they began to become desegregated. Blacks also began a strong movement to get public schools desegregated as well. They finally succeeded with Ole Miss, when they accepted James Meredith into the school. President Kennedy also tried to help blacks by approaching the problem with caution. He did this by encouraging company with government contracts to hire black Americans.On July 2, 1925 in Decatur, Ms, a black man by the name of Medgar Wiley Evers was born. Until he joined the Army in 1943, he attended school in Decatur. He served Normandy and to Alcorn to pursue his college education in which he majored in business administration. While there, he participated in many school... ...egacy of Evers is everywhere present today. This peaceful man, who had constantly urged that violence is not the way ,but paid for his beliefs with his life, was a prominent voice of struggle for civil rights in Mississippi. Many people, including his wife paid tribute to him into years past. His wife wrote a book called For Us, The Living, but the best is said to be, Mississippi, Black History Makers. Ten years after his death it was recorded that there had been one hundred and forty five black officials elected to office in Mississippi, and that there was a black student in each of the states private schools. In 1970, the Department of Health, Education, and welfare said that twenty-six percent of black people in the Mississippi public schools system with at least fifty percent white enrollment. In 1913, there were only twenty eight thousand blacks registered voters, and by 1971 there were two hundred and fifty thousand. Even in 1982, there were five hundred thousand. (JDP) Though the hard work and struggle of one man was ended with death, the changed be brought about are still evident today. This has only made Mississippi a better and more peaceful place to live for all races.

Phyllis Hunter on Reading Rockets: Reaction Paper

Reaction Paper to Phyllis huntsman on Reading Rockets The podcast of Phyllis Hunter on Reading Rockets Meet the Experts titled Teaching Reading demonstrated the importance of teaching children to shoot right the first time. According to Hunter (2008) rendition is the first civil right because without being able to read well and strategic in ally, one is unable to access his or her other civil rights and that teaching children to read is a schools first mission. Children need to be cultivation at grade level or above before completing the third grade (Hunter, 2008).I agree with Hunters statement that good is non good enough when we can do better. Teaching children to read is one ara where we cannot render to settle for good, we must strive for better(p). Reading is a fundamental skill that is necessary for all future learning. Hunter (2008) discussed the need to use the research and not teach with the method that he or she feels is the right thing. Teachers need to be able to read and evaluate research to find what will be of cling to and has creditable in schoolroom instruction.Teachers must be committed to being a lifelong learner. Learning must then be incorporated into the classroom teaching practices. Stanovich & Stanovich (2003) contend that scientific research about what works does not usually find its way into most classrooms. Teachers must be committed to devising proven methods a part of their daily instruction techniques. According to Hunter (2008) the best schools use the proven research methods in their classroom.Taylor (2002) referenced the following characteristics of teachers who are effective in teaching children to read Maintaining instructional balance, spark higher-level thinking by discussing what was read, teach how to transfer skills and strategies to independent reading, coaching as children are reading and writing, foster a sense of responsibility in children for their own learning, provide motivating instruction with many op portunities for reading and writing, teachers have high expectations that their pupils can do well, manage their classroom, foster strong parent relationships.If one agrees with Hunter that our children deserve the best in reading education, then one must develop the best characteristics in ones teaching style. Just as it is best to teach reading right the first time, it is best to start out on the right direction using proven methods than to try to correct latter. References Hunter Phyllis, (2008). Phyllis Hunter (Teaching Reading). Reading Rockets present Meet the Experts.Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http//www. readingrockets. org/podcasts/experts Taylor, B. M. (2002). Characteristics of teachers that are effective in teaching all children to read. National Education Association. Retrieved September 2, 2008. Stanovich, P. J. , & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Using Research and Reason in Education. National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http//www. nifl. gov/partnershipforreading/

Carer Definition Essay

First of all we need to look at what is meant by the word contendr. A government website agrees the word carer means manybody who looks after a wizard, relative or neighbour who needs support because of their sickness, age or disability. (Directgov 2006). A carer goes beyond what is expected from a relative, friend or neighbour they are not paid like some professionals known as care workers, although they are vital to the government in providing care to some of the most vulnerable. The type of care given within the family environment saves the government billions a year which otherwise would be unaffordable. I am passing game to discuss throughout the assignment Anne Walker a stepdaughter caring for her stepfather Angus McPhail and touch upon the challenges both these people face in their daily lifes when giving and receiving care.There are many difficulties involved in giving care. Being a carer can be physically and mentally demanding and in some cases carers need to be on cal l anytime day or night. Caring for a family member can be hard work and your role within the family setting can change. You are no longer seen as a daughter, son, wife or parent but as a carer. This can be a change in identity within the family home which can strain the quality of relationships that already existed prior to taking on the caring role. For cause if we look at the case study of Ann Walker who has a full time caring role for her stepfather Angus McPhail. Anne is also a wife, she lacks time to unload with her husband as she needs to attend to her stepfather for all of his physical needs. Her husband also has a difficult relationship with Angus which has led to Anne at clock having to physically remove herself from the house.

Ethics and “A Few Good Men” Essay

The movie is righteous abtaboo dickens nauticals indicted for the murder of a pesterer marine in their pla in additionn. Private First Class (perfluorocarbon) William capital of Chile died because of l constituteic acidosis triggered by the assault inflicted by Lance Corporal Harold Dawson and Private Lowden Downey. This assault was the result of a direct hallow by the platoon commander Lieutenant Kendrick. The order was to train Santiago to respect the rule of the Marines and the chain of command. Private Santiago had broken this chain and written directly to the NIS asking for a transfer, in veer for offering information about an illegal fence-line shooting. When Col unrivalledl Nathan Jessep, commander of the marines stationed in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, learned of this letter, he ordered the training of Private Santiago.In Guantanamo Bay, this training was referred to as Code Red, which was defined as the discipline of marines within the unit, by the unit, without involving the ripe government activity navy Jag Corp. When the navy learned of Private Santiago?s death, Dawson and Downey were placed under(a) arrest, and moved to Washington DC to be court-martialed. After a thorough litigation by defense attorney, Lt. Danial Kaffee, the court found Colonel Jessep and Lt. Kendrik conscience-smitten of the murder of PFC Santiago because they ordered the ?Code Red?. Dawson and Downey were cle bed of charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, but were found guilty of conduct improper a marine, and were discharged from the Marine Corp.6. Normative Ethical QuestionDid Dawson and Downey do the right thing by following the order?Dawson and Downeys actions were in harsh accordance with the orders given to them by their platoon commander, and were thus justified.The Marines be stayve, You follow orders or people die. This was primarily applicable during wartime when questioning an order can cause the lives of the marine and his fellow soldiers. Althou gh reserved for wartime, the marines in their day-to-day force life practice this belief. So when time comes for the marines to go to war, the thought of questioning an order never crosses their mind no matter of the severity of the order. Followingorders given by a superior officeholder is a part of the marine discipline, and breaking this discipline is non tolerated in gird forces.The order given to Dawson and Downey was to train PFC Santiago. Santiagos aggravated heart precedent was the primary reason of his death, and Dawson and Downey having followed their order were unfortunate to find Santiago dead in the training process. Had Santiago been physically fit, he would have in all likelihood, survived the training.However on the charge of becoming a linked states marine they were found guilty as charged. The reasoning for this is as followsDawson and Downey should have ignored the Code Red ordered by Colonel Jessup, and should have reported him to the proper authorities at the navy Jag Corp.The training also known as the Code Red was known to have harmful consequences. There were twain examples of the severity of the Code Red shown in the movie The first example was that of Private Bell, a soldier, getting nonhing but water for a time period of one week to keep him alive. The second example involved a soldier been given a Code Red for dropping a gas pedal during a training exercise. His punishment was to put glue on his runs, and have his arm punched for about twenty minutes. Evidently, a Code Red in military parlance meant punishment in its higher degree.PFC Santiago was known to be a shaky person. Dawson and Downey ignoring the fact that PFC Santiagos condition was deteriorating still followed Col. Jessups order for Code Red on Santiago. They should have been aw atomic number 18 of the fact that Code Red would cause irreparable damage to PFC Santiagos health on humanitarian grounds, Dawson and Downey should have contacted the proper authoriti es at the navy Jag Corp for a fair sagaciousness of the order. Looking at it from a variant perspective, Dawson and Downey would have been morally right to have neglected the order given to them by their superior. However, they were bound to their traffic override their commanding officers orders would have placed their career at stake.This case involves an ethical dilemma for the following reasons1. A murder has been committed. It is not pleasurable to take a human life merely because this individual doesnt get along with the rest of the comp all.2. The investigation of the murder is hindered. It is not acceptable to lie about the cause of death in an effort to preserve public relations or personal esteem.3. Cadets and officers lie under oath in court. It is unacceptable to lie in court. The military has determined that it is essential this case be investigated and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. A sub-group in the military cant drag its own rules of military moral ity.PFC Santiago is treated as a means rather than being treated as an end.The murder was immoral in every sense and those causing the murder should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. We further stipulate that it is unacceptable for a coverup of the murder. Colonel Nathan Jessup defends the practice of lying under an subject area of lying covered by Plato.Plato gave support for some lies when he said It is the business of the rulers of the city, if it is anybodys, to tell lies, deceiving both its enemies and its own citizens for the benefit of the city and no one else must touch this privilege.(1)If using the Plato type justification for the coverup, Jessup and those around him have a deluded sense of their place in national security. Their actions are not for the saving of military. Their actions and lies are for preservation of their own positionsThe responsibility of the commander to make sure his marines are prepared for any sort of danger from the enemy. Colonel Na than Jessup claims that codered as a method of training for soldiers was the American way. He defends the practice as that which is indispensable to defend the country. This reminds me of Plato?s conception of warriors where there is no place for the weak or sick people.The only difference between these two cases is that Plato would have not hesitated to propose euthanasia for such unproductive warriors. Colonel Jessup on the other hand proposed to train them by using force if necessary. . However, he uses intense form of punishment for the tiniest mistakes and flaws. So he cannot be justify such a punishment in the name of national security. But in today?s world such practices are detested and are against humanitarian grounds and any form of justification for their practice is barbaric.Nathan Jessup (Jack Nicholson) is a military officer who has covered up a murder. When he is in court on the rule stand, Nicholson, yells, You deficiency to know the truth? You want to know the tru th? Well, you cant handle the truth. Nicholsons testimony is that some military crimes must be cover song for national security purposes. He implies that it is acceptable to murder one cadet who isnt going along with the rest of the company. He states it is acceptable for him to lie about the incident under oath to protect the company involved as well as the military overall.Kant declares A lie is a liewhether it be told with good or bad intentBut if a lie does no harm to anyone and no ones interests are affected by it, is it a lie? Certainly.(2) Kant considers truthfulness is a tariff, an unconditional duty which holds in all circumstances.(3) According to the categorical imperative, if there is even one case in which it is acceptable to lie and honesty can be overridden, then the perfect status of the duty not to lie is compromised. Kant is most strident in not allowing for even a seemingly innocent lie, which could save a life instead of causing harm. He merely asserts that if something terrible happens it is not your fault. The terrible act is something wholly unjustified in the first place.(4)Duty is often represented by Kant and his deontological views on lying. Kant tells us that it is never acceptable to lie, and places this on the level ofa moral law, or a categorical imperative. He contends that lies always harm othersthe individual or society. To be truthful (honest) in all declarations, therefore, is a spiritual and absolutely commanding decree of reason, limited by no expediency.(5)Utilitarian Jeremy Bentham also would not allow for the Jessup defense of the coverup. Bentham delivered a frothy lecture to Englands judges who were using their power and lying to the people. Bentham sees nothing more abhorrent than using lies and power to further ones position.(6)The justification for the behaviors is weak, with hundreds of old age of morality, ethics, and laws written in opposition to Jessups rationale.In the particular case of PFC Santiago, Colo nel jessup seems to be aggravated by his appeal to the NIS and his breach of confidentiality of his unit. This brings us to the another(prenominal) moral debate. Was Santiago right in his decision to give false information of an illegal fence line shooting? We can make two speculations here. Either Santiago lied about the fence line shooting in a desperate attempt to get noticed by the authorities which could get him transferred for the information or he was mistaken about the shooting. This is to say that he did not realized that the mirror had engaged to fire first and Dawsen just retaliated in defence. Santiago can easily be forgiven for the latter.However, in the former case, normatively he should not have done what he did. But that was the only unimaginative thing he could do. Even though we can easily blame Santiago for lying, we should praise his attempt to break away from the finesse acceptance of the principles which command the lives of other marines. Even though Santti ago was physically weaker than the rest of the Platoon he had the mental capacity to fight against the odds of the absurd life in which he was seek to survive. This reminds me of the mahabharatta where Lord Krishna taught the Pandavas that it is good to lie got the fight for the Good. (I know that Kant would not agree with me)In A Few Good Men the debate is one of to whom is the crowning(prenominal) duty owed andwhere does the law fit into the equation? The soldiers facing court martial display their ultimate affiliation firmly?first and foremost their duty is to their marine corps god and country are secondary to the bond between their comrades and this is the fulcrum of the film are orders to be obeyed at all costs and where does the buck give way?Professor Alfonso Gomez-Lobo quotes Neither can military ethics properly exist without the concept of ordering. By ordering, I do not mean telling subordinates what to do. I refer, instead, to moral structuring and ethical priorities. In the movie A Few Good Men, a Marine lance corporal tells his lawyers that the code is based upon unit, corps, god, country. He has it, of course, all wrong. In fact, many illegal activities or stupid mistakes in the military services are the result of leaders failures to order wisely and well.The duty of a marine to follow the orders of a superior officer. The word duty here needs to be explained. It is the duty of the marine to fallow the orders of his superior officer if they are justified or legal. In Cuba however, disobeying an order implies to commit a crime. But since Code red is a practice discouraged by law, it is the duty of the marine to disobey such an order. An officer is always human and to equate him to be the ultimate legal authority is to make him invincible. It is this act of deception and blind faith that lets the powerful exploit.When an institution demands complete faith in its principles, the individuals within the institution are dependent on it, strive to maintain it and become unequal to(p) of independent thinking. At times like these the ethical question crops us which is more important? guiding principles of life or humans, code of honour or PFC Santiago.As for the Platoons annoyance on Santiagos betrayal for the unit and selfishness, I dont think it is valid. It would have been a different case had there been some compassion for Santiago within his Unit. His friends beat him up as a part of following orders, to keep up their jobs. From this perspective, they too are selfish. The only difference is that Santiago istowards the receiving end of brutalities, and it is convenient for the rest of the Platoon who were comparably stronger to talk about the loyalty within the unit.Interestingly, Lieutenant Kendrick too believe in the proper authority of God or his commanding officer Colonel Nathan R JessupHere we see that blind faith is associated with both God and the ColonelMoreover, the Colonel starts associating himself with God who protects and punishes others and expects the respect of all. He thinks that he is the personification of certain unquestionable principles.That the colonel lives by the rules and notions of the Marine Corps and doesnt fully comprehend the world outside.Both Dawson and Kaffee are good at what they do. That?s all they have in common. The contrast between the disciplined Dawson and the flippant Kaffee can be traced to their constitution of beliefs and their environment.Dawson mentions that he conjugated the navy so that he could live by a code. He believes that he did his duty and did it well and was even ready to face its consequences, but not plead guilty. Here we see the romanticized version of the code of honor. He failed to realize that the real strength of character lies in his discretion to protect the weak and not train him to protect himself. He lives in the misconceptions where certain principles appearDawson is like a person who wants to be religious and associates himself with religious practices no matter what they are which gives him a sense of satisfaction.Kaffee on the other hand has no delusions about the law. His only criterion is to solve his case as soon as accomplishable with the best interest of his client at heart. He believes that a case is not won by the law but the lawyer. He seems to have anomic his faith in all legal ethics due to the waylaw is practiced around him and he seems to be a part of the system too. Or in the least he has least to live with it.Daniel Kaffee is a smart, flippant, good-looking young Navy lawyer. in his late 20s, 15 months out of Harvard Law School, and a brilliant legal mind waiting for a courageous spirit to drive it. He is, at this point in his life, fervent about nothing except maybe softball. His father was a renowned jurist, and Dan feels the burden of his fathers reputation. Indeed, his casual, tongue-in-cheek attitude to the law is his way of avoiding simile with his father. You cant fail if you d ont even try. However, he lived in the shadows of his father having no misconceptions regarding different facets of law. He does not believe in a romanticized version of his profession.He did not believe his case to be a winner and first attempts to find an easy way out. Even though he sympathized with the state of his clients who were forced to carry out their orders, were blinded by the belief in false practices like ?Code Red?, he silent the politics associated with the case. His frustration is revealed when he emphasizes that I think you will lose and it does not matter what I believe, it only matters what I can prove..Despite these flaws he proves to be an excellent lawyer. This is because unlike the marines. He has learnt to question authority. He has not been conditioned by blind principles.the lawyer defending the two marines in A Few Good Men has to consider whether he should go beyond the legal and ethical codes under which he is bound and accuse a witness on the stand o f committing a crime for which the two marines are accused. He of course does and justice is done.In conclusion, it is evident that Dawson and Downey performed their duty as was expected of them. On ethical grounds, they would have been better off notifying the appropriate authorities of the nature of the order and the circumstances in which the order was to be executed. However, as fellowmarines under a commanding officer, they were compelled to follow orders without looking into the ethical or moral aspects of their actions. A marine?s discipline is taken very seriously by his commanding officers however, this does not imply that discipline takes priority over the mental and physical health of a marine. Santiago?s heart condition was no secret. Despite this fact, he was given the Code Red knowing fully well that he may not be able to take the embrace ? definitely, an unethical decision on the part of the authorities concerned.