Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

lore, not Dogma Should Be the Standard - Essay ExampleOver the past century and one-half, however, peoples opinions regarding evolution make believe experienced an evolution. Many religious persons today acknowledge evolution to be valid. The Pope even admitted creation and evolution are compatible. Still, there are a dwindling numbers of people who choose to stubbornly reject the science and contend that magical account of life described in the Bible is the church doctrine truth. This emotion-charged dispute usually occurs when the fundamentalists object to science being taught in school. They want the creation version of events taught alongside the scientific version as a feasible alternative. Eventually, everyone testament acknowledge that the matter is not subject to dispute no more than the distrust of a flat earth vs. round earth is debated. Unfortunately, it will take generations to achieve this reasonable goal be engender our society evolves extremely slowly. Creationis m is not based on the scientific model. No evidence exists, nothing to test or question. It is based on the belief that a supernatural being magically created the universe including all life in it. The faithful accept this version of events without question because if they did question it they likely would cease to believe it. recognition is a journey for the truth. Hypothesis is formed from observation, testing and retesting. When new information is presented the original premise is altered. Science continually tries to disprove the hypothesis or theory until the conclusion is shown as credible and irrefutable based on all available evidence. Religion right away accepts the explanations of an ancient, very superstitious and uneducated people. Religion is based on faith that is never questioned while science is based on knowledge that is constantly questioned (Edwards, 1980). Creationists first line of attack is that evolution is just a theory therefore unproven and unacceptable w hen compared to the Gods unassailable holy words. growth is scientifically proven by the same method scientists prove other universally held theories. Gravity is a theory. No one knows precisely how or why gravity works but we all know it does, same with evolution. Creationists require a much higher standard of proof from evolutionists than they are willing to provide. spectral fundamentalists thought the earth was flat prior to the 16th Century. In fact, since the church controlled the government at that time it was considered heresy to publically disagree with that falsity, a curse punishable by torture and/or death. However, learned people including Christopher Columbus and Queen Isabella knew better. So did Aristotle who proved the earth was round 2000 years before Columbus. (Lienhard, 1998). Science was rejected then as now by the overtly religious but even they accept the scientific evidence regarding disease, that the Devil does not cause sickness. They also, because of sc ience, realize the sun does not revolve around a flat earth as is described in the Bible. There are still more points of major conflict between science and religion. In each case, only one will eventually win public support. The historical record indicates that religion wins very few of these disputes (Robinson, 2003) Darwin theorized that species adapt and change over the duration of millions of years according to new environmental conditions. He called this process natural selection. Darwin observed and record